The Grudge 2

Wuchak

Jun 7, 2026 · via TMDB

★ 6.0

**_Effectively spooky with great cast, but dubious story structure_** Three schoolgirls visit a mysterious house in Japan. Whoever enters is cursed and will die by spooky specters. Amber Tamblyn plays the protagonist, the sister of the protagonist of the first film, played by Sarah Michelle Gellar (who has a small role here). Teresa Palmer and Sarah Roemer are also on hand as schoolgirls with Jennifer Beals playing the mother of the latter. This is a well-made horror flick that focuses on haunting atmosphere and ghostly scares rather than cartoony gore. There's a darkroom sequence that's particularly effective. The cast is superior to the first movie, with numerous female characters and quality actresses to play 'em. Unfortunately, the story structure is weak in that it fails to work up suspense, except for the last act where the filmmakers (try to) tie everything together. The first hour feels like several vignettes rather than a cohesive screenplay. I don't have a problem with non-linear story lines IF they're done right, like 1994's "Pulp Fiction" and 2007's "Before the Devil Knows Your Dead," but "The Grudge 2" isn't as effecctive. Despite my criticisms, I like this movie and think it's worthwhile if you're in the mood for a haunting picture in the mold of 2002's "The Ring." Some have even called it the scariest movie ever made. I get where they're coming from, but it didn't scare me because I don't find ghosts scary. However, it IS spooky and thick with haunting ambiance. That said, some scenes could go either way depending on the person. For instance, when a certain character falls off (or is thrown off) the roof of a tall building and lands almost at the feet of a couple other characters I busted out laughing. It runs 1h 42m (1h 48m for the Director's Cut) and was shot in Tokyo, mostly at Toho Studios. GRADE: B-/C+

The Movie Diorama

Jan 16, 2020 · via TMDB

★ 3.0

The Grudge 2 resents its illogical plot for basic ineffective jump scares. Shimizu’s western remake of his J-horror creation was one littered with promise, albeit irrefutably rough around the edges. Mediocre acting, snooze-inducing storytelling and jump scares aplenty. Japanese ghost children, that either croak as if exhuming a sore throat or scream like a domestic cat, popping their heads out of attics, entangling women in wavering hair and just being a general nuisance. Well, Shimizu begrudgingly brings Kayako and Toshio back for more ghoulish antics, as the fire initiated by Sarah “Buffy or Daphne, your pick...” Michelle Gellar somehow unleashed the dark spirits into the world. Essentially no longer restricted to the abandoned Saeki household, although still only haunt those that enter the house? I don’t know, the logic is tossed out of the shōji at this point. Instead of remaking the original sequel for ‘Ju-On’, Shimizu and writer Susco opted for a more original take, answering the fundamental question that we all yearned to ask: “gurl, where did you get that eye liner?”. Turns out, dark spirits is the answer. What I supremely detest about this sequel is the direction the two aforementioned crew members decide to take the story. It’s no longer about greeting death with a deep and powerful rage, cursing the location the spirits resides in. A semi-folklorish strand of Japanese traditions. Instead, to appease the simple minds of western mainstream audiences, they settled for a mundane supernatural progression that essentially tarnishes the original’s plot in almost every possible angle available. Sure, Shimizu integrates some well-intentioned imagery that may or may not produce a chill or two. Namely the photograph sequence and bludgeoning someone with a frying pan during breakfast (what a waste of bacon!). Yet these are often accompanied by a predictable jump scare that relinquishes the horror. Kayako pouncing out of a photograph. Kayako wandering the hospital corridors bursting lightbulbs in her wake (not very cost-effective...). Kayako playing footsies in a Love hotel room. Kayako being Kayako. Once or twice was enough. Twenty times? Rapidly becoming unimaginative. The non-linear intersecting sub-plots, imitating its predecessor, provided no twists to the narrative and, if anything, forced the pacing to be inconsistent with its constant switching between character perspectives. A classic peer pressure scenario which is enough to make anyone’s eyes roll a hundred times. Magic mirror tricks, very unfashionable hoodies and an absolute waste of Buffy. The three elements that perfectly surmise the contents of this lacklustre sequel that boasts no genuine scares or tolerable execution. Again, stick to the original franchise.