Get the MovieNight app
Add it to your home screen — faster & full screen
Heyday Films
Warner Bros. Pictures
Fantastic Beasts Collection
Fate of one. Future of all.
Gellert Grindelwald has escaped imprisonment and has begun gathering followers to his cause—elevating wizards above all non-magical beings. The only one capable of putting a stop to him is the wizard he once called his closest friend, Albus Dumbledore. However, Dumbledore will need to seek help from the wizard who had thwarted Grindelwald once before, his former student Newt Scamander, who agrees to help, unaware of the dangers that lie ahead. Lines are drawn as love and loyalty are tested, even among the truest friends and family, in an increasingly divided wizarding world.
CinemaSerf
Feb 2, 2025 · via TMDB
In order to thwart the evil "Grindelwald" (Johnny Depp) from creating his own Arian version of enforcers for the wizardly world, "Dumbledore" (Jude Law) drafts in his talented understudy "Newt" (Eddie Redmayne) to help him out. Unfortunately, their nemesis has recently escaped from high-security custody and so the Ministry needs help for their men "Abernethy" (Kevin Guthrie) and "Theseus" (Callum Turner) too. Perhaps if these three can join forces - at wands length - then they can track down the evil "Grindelwald" and his own young and disturbed protégé "Credence" (the all too sparingly featured Ezra Miller) who himself may be the last in a long line of pure-bloods. With all now set for a gripping and exciting vat and mouse adventure, I don't really understand why this didn't work. The ingredients are all there: the acting talents are formidable and the visual effects are genuinely impressive - but the film is completely flat. There's not an hint of passion or emotion throughout. Depp looks bored by the whole proceedings and though Redmayne tries to imbue his character with a sense of honourable mischief, even that comes across as dry and procedural. Perhaps just too much emphasis has been placed on the sophisticated look of the film? There's nowhere near enough of an anchor in the plot to keep anyone interested in the characters and instead I just found myself looking at my watch wondering if this had much longer to go. Funnily enough, this might have worked better if you'd just read it and imagined much of what's presented to us here - at least then you might have been a little more invested in the sinisterness of the threat. Instead, though, it's all just dull and doesn't really build on the antagonisms of racial prejudice and supremacy that obviously underpin this second feature. It does need to be seen in a cinema. It's grand cinematography - luckily they'd kept the set for "Hogwarts" and score from James Newton Howard give it some sense of occasion, but it's much like the first film and is very much a victory for style over substance.
GenerationofSwine
Jan 14, 2023 · via TMDB
Well, there was one too many twists here and I only say that because it was unnecessary. The plot would have been cleaner if they just let that one go...and don't worry, you'll know what is being mentioned when you watch it. It would have worked in a novel, but in a screen play it just made it a bit messy and loose. And, unfortunately, that is what the critics are going to focus on. But then, J.K. is a novelist and it got a bit lost in translation from one writing style to another. But, beyond that you have a wonderful cast and the film as a whole is delightfully fun. Eddie Redmayne is once more the lead, and he does a decent job...but what is better is how generous both Johnny Depp and Jude Law were in the film. Each have, in their day, stolen a show or two. They are both fully capable of stealing the spotlight...but instead they took a step back rather than hogging any of the limelight and, as a result, it allowed for everyone involved to deliver a solid performance. It could have easily gone the way of a Russel Crowe film with Law and Depp involved...however they didn't do the Crowe-hog and because of that the film ended up with more balance than it should have with the unnecessary plot turn. In other-words, they helped bring it back from being truly over blown. So what do you get? You get to walk into the weird world of Harry Potter again, and that is always fun. You get adventure and mystery and, again, that is always fun. You get decent performances and a solid (if bloated plot) and you walk away entertained. It's worth viewing even if it is unbalanced. It's still entertaining and fun and, after all, that is the point of making a movie.
Martha
Jul 26, 2022 · via TMDB
Confused, lost, Johnny Depp always awesome. I think the days of me playing in the Harry Potter world are over.
r96sk
May 12, 2022 · via TMDB
Better than its predecessor, even if I still didn't really dig it. <em>'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald'</em> has more of a vibe about it, especially early on, and is marginally better paced. Overall, though, I'm kinda split on how I feel about this second instalment. It is a definite improvement, and yet I don't have any noteworthy positives to share about it. The cast, despite names I like, are just so forgettable to me in this. As such, I don't feel like I can give it any more than a 6/10 rating - which feels harsh, but 7/10 feels too high. With that said, I still plan to check out <em>'Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore'</em>. It just needs that little extra oomph and these would be films that I'd enjoy, so hopefully that 2022 release will produce.
Gimly
Aug 10, 2020 · via TMDB
I re-watched the original _Fantastic Beasts_ today to prep for _Crimes of Grindelwald_ and it made me realise that the only reason I gave that first film a positive review was because of Queenie Goldstein. She's just **such** a sweetheart. Her character wasn't the **only** thing I liked about that movie, but without her, it still gets pushed down into Rotten. So when they took her in this one and first made her a rapist and then a Nazis, I was uh... Not exactly stoked. But that's a personal thing, and I try to, at least partially, put that aside and review on things like technical aspect. And in that Avenue, _Crimes of Grindelwald_ is an **abysmal** failure. This is not the outright worst film of the year, but it was definitely the worst one I've seen in cinemas for a long damn time. _Final rating:★½: - Boring/disappointing. Avoid where possible._
trineo03
Dec 17, 2018 · via TMDB
First of all, just like in the last movie the acting in this film is excellent but with a few exceptions. Eddie Redmayne was still excellent as Newt but I think he did a better job in the first film. Same thing with Dan Fogler who didn’t seem as funny but useless and could have just been written out of this film. But I did really like Jude Law as a young Dumbledore and Joshua Shea who plays young Newt. Joshua played younger Newt so well that he actually looked like a younger version of Eddie. Jude Law brought the same kind of attitude towards Dumbledore that we all know and love. The special effects and set designs still looked marvellous. The creatures special effects just like last time were great and looked like if we saw them in real life that’s what they would look like. The sets looked directly like they got taken directly out of a history book. Now with this film being a sequel, you would think they would fix the problems they had in the last film but for this one, they didn‘t. The main thing that bugged me was Johnny Depp. He didn’t do a good job of playing the main villain. It could be because of the writing or just because of his acting. Next is all of the subplots. I counted there are around four of them. But seeing how I couldn’t really figure out the main plot one of those subplots could have been the main plot. The last thing is the pacing in this film. Some scenes just seemed like the plot stopped for this one scene that could have just been taken out. The entire film felt really slow and only in the action scenes did it seem to pick up. At least the music was good. In the end, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald just seemed like a cash grab film. I give Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald a 5.5/10.
User reviews courtesy of TMDB.
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
fuboTV
HBO Max Amazon Channel
Peacock Premium
YouTube TV
HBO Max
Peacock Premium Plus
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home
Spectrum On Demand
Plex
Eddie Redmayne
Newt Scamander
Katherine Waterston
Tina Goldstein
Dan Fogler
Jacob Kowalski
Alison Sudol
Queenie Goldstein
Johnny Depp
Grindelwald
Jude Law
Albus Dumbledore
Ezra Miller
Credence Barebone
Zoë Kravitz
Leta Lestrange
Callum Turner
Theseus Scamander
Claudia Kim
Nagini
Carmen Ejogo
Seraphina Picquery
Jessica Williams
Eulalie Hicks
William Nadylam
Yusuf Kama
Ingvar E. Sigurðsson
Grimmson
Ólafur Darri Ólafsson
Skender
Kevin Guthrie
Abernathy
Brontis Jodorowsky
Nicolas Flamel
Derek Riddell
Torquil Travers
David Sakurai
Krall
Fiona Glascott
Minerva McGonagall
Wolf Roth
Spielman
Victoria Yeates
Bunty
Poppy Corby-Tuech
Rosier
Cornell John
Arnold Guzman
Claudius Peters
Nagel
Bart Soroczynski
Stebbins
Danielle Hugues
Irma Dugard
Alfie Simmons
McClaggan
Isaac Cortinovis Johnson
McClaggan's Friend
Olivia Popica
Receptionist
Alfie Mailley
Child in Bubble
Simon Wan
Chang
Andrew Turner
MacDuff
Linda Santiago
Credence's Aunt
Alfrun Rose
Red-Haired Witch
Maja Bloom
Carrow
Olwen Fouéré
Melusine
Simon Meacock
Krafft
David Wilmot
Portkey Tout
Ed Gaughan
French Policeman
Jamie Campbell Bower
Young Grindelwald
Toby Regbo
Young Dumbledore
Hugh Quarshie
Mustafa Kama
Isaura Barbé-Brown
Laurena Kama
Keith Chanter
Corvus Lestrange Senior
Jemima Woolnough
Gryffindor Girl
Hollie Burgess
Gryffindor Girl
Thea Lamb
Young Leta Lestrange (13-16 Years Old)
Joshua Shea
Young Newt (13-16 Years Old)
Isaac Domingos
Yusuf Kama (12 Years Old)
Christopher Birks
Young Auror-Auditorium
Sabine Crossen
Mrs. Lestrange (uncredited)
Morrison Thomas
Old Carnie (uncredited)
Johanna Thea
Ministry of Magic Witch (uncredited)
Liv Hansen
Ministry of Magic Witch (uncredited)
Israel Ruiz
Ministry of Magic Wizard (uncredited)
Jag Patel
Senior Wizard (uncredited)
Deepak Anand
Wizard (uncredited)
Phil Hodges
Prisoner 001 (uncredited)
Michael Haydon
Shopkeeper (uncredited)
Tim Ingall
Spectrum (uncredited)
Stephen McDade
Cirque Arcanus Worker (uncredited)
Jeremy Oliver
Circus passerby (uncredited)
Dave Simon
Muggle at Circus (uncredited)
Jason Redshaw
Chef (uncredited)
Callum Forman
Doorman (uncredited)
Ryan Hannaford
Sailor (uncredited)
Donna Preston
Circus Compare (uncredited)
Nasir Jama
Macusa Prison (uncredited)
Aykut Hilmi
Shafiq (uncredited)
Natalie Lauren
Parisian Woman (uncredited)
Deano Bugatti
Muggle (uncredited)
Adrian Wheeler
Party Guest (uncredited)
Annarie Boor
Wand Seller (uncredited)
Ana Cilas
French Muggle (uncredited)
Grant Crookes
Cafe Owner (uncredited)
Maddie Evans
School Pupil (uncredited)
Fergus Clegg
Assistant Set Decoration
Stuart Craig
Production Design
Philippe Rousselot
Director of Photography
Colleen Atwood
Costume Design
Marc Mailley
Stunt Coordinator
Annabel Wood
Stunts
Bobby Holland Hanton
Stunts
Bogdan Kumšackij
Stunts
Elliot Hawkes
Stunts
George Kirby
Stunts
Jonathan Cohen
Stunts
Laura Swift
Stunts
Luke Tumber
Stunts
Matt Crook
Stunts
Nellie Burroughes
Stunts
Pete Ford
Stunts
Rachael Evelyn
Stunts
Sarah Lochlan
Stunts
Tolga Kenan
Stunts
David Yates
Director
Stephen Woolfenden
Second Unit Director
Mark Day
Editor
Danny Cohen
Executive Producer
Tim Lewis
Executive Producer
David Heyman
Producer
J.K. Rowling
Producer
Lionel Wigram
Producer
Steve Kloves
Producer
Tim Lewis
Unit Production Manager
Mark DeSimone
ADR Mixer
James Newton Howard
Music Score Producer
James Newton Howard
Original Music Composer
Glenn Freemantle
Sound Designer
Andy Nelson
Sound Re-Recording Mixer
Aulo Licinio
Animation Supervisor
Chris Upson
Visual Effects
Andy Kind
Visual Effects Supervisor
Christian Manz
Visual Effects Supervisor
Nicolas Chevallier
Visual Effects Supervisor
Tim Burke
Visual Effects Supervisor
J.K. Rowling
Original Series Creator
J.K. Rowling
Screenplay
Nov 16, 2018
Mar 12, 2019
© 2025-2026 MovieNight. All rights reserved.
Versus
Sign in to play →
Three Hours to Kill
1954
The Poynting Vec↑or
2022
Sign in to vote
Battle your watched movies head-to-head
Community Top Movies
Evil Dead II
1987 · 14 wins
The Dark Knight
2008 · 14 wins
Halloween
1978 · 13 wins
Final Destination
2000 · 12 wins
Halloween II
1981 · 11 wins
Trivia
Leaderboard →Playing as a guest — sign in to save your score and rank on the leaderboard.
Movie Trivia
Guess the movie from a clue — tagline, plot, cast and more. Pick from four posters.
What movie experience do you prefer?
What is your favorite movie genre?
Versus
Sign in to play →
Three Hours to Kill
1954
The Poynting Vec↑or
2022
Sign in to vote
Battle your watched movies head-to-head
Community Top Movies
Evil Dead II
1987 · 14 wins
The Dark Knight
2008 · 14 wins
Halloween
1978 · 13 wins
Final Destination
2000 · 12 wins
Halloween II
1981 · 11 wins
Trivia
Leaderboard →Playing as a guest — sign in to save your score and rank on the leaderboard.
Movie Trivia
Guess the movie from a clue — tagline, plot, cast and more. Pick from four posters.
What movie experience do you prefer?
What is your favorite movie genre?
We use essential cookies to run MovieNight, plus analytics (Google Analytics) and advertising (Google AdSense) cookies. By continuing to browse, you agree to this — or click No and we won't. See our Terms & Privacy Policy to learn more.