MovieNight.app
Murder on the Orient Express
20th Century Fox 20th Century Fox
Genre Films Genre Films
Scott Free Productions Scott Free Productions
The Mark Gordon Company The Mark Gordon Company
Hercule Poirot (Kenneth Branagh) Collection Hercule Poirot (Kenneth Branagh) Collection

Murder on the Orient Express

Everyone is a suspect.

2017 114 min ★ 6.7 (10,699) Released
Crime Drama Mystery

Genius Belgian detective Hercule Poirot investigates the murder of an American tycoon aboard the Orient Express train.

Original title
Murder on the Orient Express
Language
EN
Country
US
Budget
$55,000,000
Revenue
$352,800,000
Reviews & Ratings 5
daniel_carr

daniel_carr

Jan 20, 2026 · via TMDB

★ 4.0

Was great fun watching Johnny Depp again but this story while interesting was really disappointing. Found the ending out of character for Hercule Poirot although it was a great moral question for the audience so I understand what the writer was trying to do. Seeing the similarity between Sherlock Holmes I find these stories far too simplistic. Although the Englishman always chasing after his arch enemy is tiresome!

Filipe Manuel Neto

Filipe Manuel Neto

May 8, 2023 · via TMDB

★ 5.0

**An effort worthy of merit, but which did not result in a really good work.** Kenneth Branagh is one of those actors/directors who doesn't seem to be afraid of a challenge, and I respect him for that, even if his choices aren't always the wisest. Bringing the greatest book of Agatha Christie's work to the cinema is a considerable challenge, not only given the richness of the material and characters, but also taking into account the relevance of the work and the admirers who remain faithful to the author's books (I am one of them). I can't help but say: for me, she is one of the greatest writers of the 20th century. She not only helped to cement the police narrative, but also substantively developed it. Therefore, I must absolutely condemn the recent news about the revision of her books, whose new editions will be stripped of any term, word or minimally offensive mention. In the 16th century, books were burned. Today, despite the justifications, we refine the practices, but maintain the line of thought and the similarity in attitudes towards books that can offend us. The “Orient Express” has already been adapted for the screen on several occasions. The first, in 1974, was a real show and is full of stellar actors. However, one cannot ignore the television adaptation starring David Suchet, an actor who, in a tour-de-force of many years, embodied Poirot in an impeccable way, difficult to match. The film has its merits, which are based essentially on the visuals. The cinematography makes intelligent use of light, the spectacular snowy landscapes and the vintage elegance of the train, which replicates the real Orient Express, a train that, despite numerous business mishaps, still exists. The costumes and props are also magnificent and help to recreate the era, the 1930s. A special note for the way in which the film manages to give us the perfect sensation of the smallness of the spaces. Another peaceful point is the performance of the cast. I won't be being unfair in saying that each one did a good job with the material received. Unsurprisingly, Branagh is the protagonist and gives us a Poirot that gradually becomes more human. He starts out as a weird individual, a deduction factory applied to solving crimes, and ends up with another perspective on truth and justice. That is the focal point of the book. The work of Judi Dench and Michelle Pfeiffer also deserves a special note. The others – and the film is impressive for having such a heavy cast – seem to be there just to be able to say that they worked with the director and that they were part of the project. These are all good things! However, the film is not without serious problems. The biggest and most blatant are the action scenes. Poirot is a dandy, a maniac, a genius, but he was never an action figure or a brawler. In the books, he leaves that to the police or loyal friends like Captain Hastings or Chief Inspector Japp. Seeing him in action scenes doesn't seem like something he would do. Branagh got it wrong here, just as he got it wrong with that unkempt, tasteless mustache. The books have several descriptions of Poirot's mustache and none of them fit the hair accessory used in this film, which looks more like a dead rat. The character is also stripped of most of her many obsessions, limiting itself to a craze linked to boiled eggs. It's absurd! Branagh, who did not even stop to think that he is not at all similar to the character, did not consider the shape of Poirot's head, which is described as "ovoid", and did not even try to reproduce the character's gait, which walked in small steps. And considering the elegance and refinement that characterize Poirot, the clothes Branagh wears and the almost absence of a hat are unspeakable details. The film – which focuses on Poirot – also makes a very shallow use of each character's material. Some of the ones that most dialogue with the detective in the book, like Debenham, are almost absent here. Finally, we have Johnny Depp, a casting error, turning Rachett into a kind of hateful amateur mobster.

DocTerminus

DocTerminus

Feb 21, 2022 · via TMDB

★ 9.0

Beginning with Kenneth Branagh's second decade as a filmmaker, I suggest he became an industry workhorse. He acted in many films and directed several, all with varying results in quality. Most pointedly, few felt like they were personal projects for 15 years. For example, his direction of **THOR** is at the pleasure of Kevin Feige, the head of Marvel Films. I argue that **MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS is personal**. I believe that the "Shakespeare" guy believed he could create the "Agatha Christie" equivalent of the Marvel Universe. As of this writing, he has returned a second film, **DEATH ON THE NILE**. There are at least 30 more Hercule Poirot novels remaining for potential sequels. Likely, we won't see a third unless the second proves to be successful. _ORIENT EXPRESS_ received a lukewarm reception - a tepid selection of both audience and critics who find the film neither superior or horrible. But I am committed. I find this classic story delivered through modern technology is beautiful, fun and entertaining. It remains quaint and intimate even as computer generated matte paintings create the stunning atmospheric vistas. I even find the film quite open to repeated viewings. The beautiful color and imagery is supported by a score by Branagh's friend and musical voice, Patrick Doyle. The two feed off each other - Doyle's assertive and aggressive compositions uniquely mimic Branagh's earnest storytelling. In other words, it is rarely quiet. Starting with **MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING**, Branagh does a lot of stunt casting. This time may just take the cake. Every performer is an A-player and each is given at least one scene to chew a bit of the scenery. Make no mistake about it, this story is a tour de force for the role of Hercule Poirot. Branagh's performance of the Belgian super-sleuth is quite fun, beginning on one of the greatest character introductions in the decade. If critical and box office is a good reflection, its a fifty fifty shot whether you will enjoy Branagh's **MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS**. To be fair, most of the negative reviews I see are written by someone who is comparing this film to the 1974 star-studded telling. Those would rather you look up that version (where you will likely not know many of that _star studded_ cast)

F

frankbama

Feb 15, 2022 · via TMDB

★ 5.0

I have always loved this story and was looking forward to seeing this adaptation but afraid it was going to be Branagh'd, especially when finding out he was playing Poirot himself and cast Johnny Depp as Ratchett. When a director wants to put their own stamp on something, they usually screw it up. Branagh dipped both of his shoes in poop (symmetrical, yes?) before stamping Christie's work. Let the story take the film where it needs to be. CGI is not where it wants to be. There's nothing wrong with a dialogue-heavy movie no matter what the studio thinks. Casting Grade: D * When I heard Depp was going to be in it, I assumed he'd be Poirot and Branagh as Ratchet. Depp would have been a terrible choice too but would have made more sense then Henry V himself. Depp did not fit the Ratchett part at all. Richard Widmark's portrayal in the 1974 film was dead-on. This time an Ed Harris would have been perfect. If he weren't available, Charles Dance. Dance may be too British rather than Italian/American but he still can shoot daggers with his eyes. JK Simmons would work and potentially Sean Bean or Viggo. * Poirot - This is a tough role to cast, no doubt. Suchet IS Poirot and Finney, though exaggerated was entertaining. Branagh is not tall but this movie seems to film him as larger than his character is. He's supposed to look like a "funny-looking little Frenchman." Yes I know he's Belgian. But also little and funny-looking. All the upward angles make Branagh look bigger, not smaller. Not quite the star power and I wouldn't buy a ticket just to see Daniel Bruhl, he might work. * Michele Pheifer as Ms. Hubbard was great. The best of the casting, so points here. * I think Cruz and Dench were fine, as was Dafoe. Only problem here is that even as a red-blooded American male I don't remember much about Cruz's performance. That is criminal underuse. Bergman won an Oscar in this role! It's tough to live up to but still, Ken. * Josh Gad? Fine as an actor, awful in this role. Eddie Marsan maybe? Martin Freeman? Perkins was perfect so let's go more in that direction. * Bouc? Bouc is not and should not be 28. Yes they said he's the son of the director of the line but that's dumb. Make him a bit more of a Poirot contemporary so the chemistry is there as if they'd been friends for years. * Ridley and Odom. This problem is more with the story "updates". Daisy's fine and Odom's acting is fine though. * The rest of the cast is ok- meh and nothing more. The Suchet one wasn't super star-studded, but with an ensemble cast, more of the cast should have been better known. Story itself - Here's the fun - 1. Why does the opening sequence in Syria take 20 minutes? The first question here though is "is Branagh trying to introduce Poirot to a new audience?" I would venture to guess that the vast majority of the audience knows Poirot, at least somewhat. The Syrian intro is roughly half of a chapter in the book, a quick few minutes in Suchet's version and not even really dealt with in Finney's. You can also do the egg thing on the train when he orders breakfast. That's enough. 2. Shootout? What? Why? 3. Arbuthnot. Why combine the Col and Doc characters? The 2 should be separate, either because the doc is completely removed from the subjects (book and 1974) or is a separate suspect himself (Suchet). Having them combined just seems pointless especially when you add sharpshooting to his repertoire and the inter-racial reasoning for the quiet romance with Mary. That's a lot, especially since it's 1935. 4. Moustache. Ridiculous but not in the good Poirot-image sort of way. In fact he looks more like Wyatt Earp. HP is vain and his hair would not be shown as gray - it would be dyed black and a fantastic shape, not a ridiculous rug. Again, Suchet has it beat. 5. Hanging outside. Huh? It's a snow drift in the mountains and they're outside hanging out in clothes they were wearing on the train. Winter clothes but not warm enough to have a picnic in. The Suchet version definitely got it right - the passengers were COLD. They showed that with the bundling up, the atmosphere, etc. Also, people from other coaches could be mingling. Whole point was to not let people come in or go out of the Calais coach and dining car. 6. The train tunnel ending roundup. No. Bad Kenneth, bad. Dining car, keep it there. Don't try to be clever, it didn't work nor should it. Cramped in the dining car, trapped with HP's monologue. It works. 7. Gun. Again, what's with the guns? The one under Ratchet's pillow is the only one necessary. His reasoning doesn't make sense either - Bouc is still there and he knows about the plot so they'd have to kill him too, not just HP. 8. CGI - just stop. Video trains. Not hard. 9. The Daisy note - neat trick being able to see the ENTIRE note clear as day and not just a few letters or a word or two. Overall - 5/10 is generous. More of a 4. I really wish we could start over here but with Death on the Nile out now I hope 2 is all Branagh does. At least Nile is not one of AC's better stories. Lets wait 10 years and start again. Works for superheroes, why not one with just brains but no braun? Evil Under the Sun perhaps??

D

Dark Jedi

Apr 19, 2018 · via TMDB

★ 4.0

I am a great fan of Agatha Christie in general and Hercule Poirot in particular. When yet another remake of Murder on the Orient express came out I was somewhat hesitant. After all, the one with David Suchet was perfect. I guess I was right to be hesitant. This is another one of those remakes where you just wonder…why? As a movie it is not too bad but as a Hercule Poirot movie, the classical Murder on the Orient Express no less, it is like buying a piece of prime filet of beef and discovering that the butcher gave you chicken drums when you open the package. Edible but not at all what you paid for. To me this movie was a blatant attempt to make an Americanized version of Hercule Poirot. It was poorly done by a clueless scriptwriter and director and it was deeply disrespectful to the original character. The movie starts of by introducing Hercule as the pedantic, somewhat weird, person that he is but the attempt is just dumb and silly. Apart from the scene more or less making Hercule look like a jerk, these people apparently know him, why would they serve two eggs of different sizes in the first place? Oh right, because the director thought the audience was too dumb to make that reflection. Then there are some things that Hercule simply do not do. Like walking on the roofs of train cars, climbing around and chasing criminals as if he was some action hero. He even gets shot and more or less just shrugs it off for Christ sake! And do not get me started on that grotesque moustache! As I said, an Americanized version of Hercule Poirot. Unfortunately bigger is not always better. I can go on for some time here so let’s move on. Technically the movie is not that bad. The scenes, the decor, the acting in general etc. can even be said to be good. Unfortunately, for me, this was constantly overshadowed by the brutal slaughtering of my beloved Hercule Poirot character. Part of this is probably due to the movie trying to focus so much on Hercule that most of the other actors almost feel like … props, even though they themselves are doing quite a good job of their roles. One reviewer wrote that “The actors seem to have been invited, not to play characters, but to watch Kenneth Branagh act.” and there seems to be some truth in that. The movie ends with a hint of further moves. Personally, I hope there will not be a continuation of this train wreck (pun intended).

User reviews courtesy of TMDB.

Keywords 20
1930s alps mountains based on novel or book detective europe investigation istanbul knife murder murder mystery orient express princess professor remake snow stabbing steam train train venice, italy whodunit
Buy
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Apple TV Store Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
YouTube YouTube
Fandango At Home Fandango At Home
Streaming
HBO Max Amazon Channel HBO Max Amazon Channel
YouTube TV YouTube TV
Cinemax Amazon Channel Cinemax Amazon Channel
HBO Max HBO Max
Cinemax Apple TV channel Cinemax Apple TV channel
Rent
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Apple TV Store Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
YouTube YouTube
Fandango At Home Fandango At Home
Cast 52
Kenneth Branagh

Kenneth Branagh

Hercule Poirot

Tom Bateman

Tom Bateman

Bouc

Michelle Pfeiffer

Michelle Pfeiffer

Caroline Hubbard

Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp

Edward Ratchett

Josh Gad

Josh Gad

Hector MacQueen

Willem Dafoe

Willem Dafoe

Gerhard Hardman

Judi Dench

Judi Dench

Princess Dragomiroff

Derek Jacobi

Derek Jacobi

Edward Henry Masterman

Leslie Odom Jr.

Leslie Odom Jr.

Dr. Arbuthnot

Daisy Ridley

Daisy Ridley

Miss Mary Debenham

Penélope Cruz

Penélope Cruz

Pilar Estravados

Olivia Colman

Olivia Colman

Hildegarde Schmidt

Lucy Boynton

Lucy Boynton

Countess Elena Andrenyi

Marwan Kenzari

Marwan Kenzari

Pierre Michel

Manuel Garcia-Rulfo

Manuel Garcia-Rulfo

Biniamino Marquez

Sergei Polunin

Sergei Polunin

Count Rudolph Andrenyi

Paapa Essiedu

Paapa Essiedu

Young Policeman

Asan N'Jie

Asan N'Jie

Hotel Waiter

Michael Rouse

Michael Rouse

British Police Chief Inspector

Elliot Levey

Elliot Levey

Rabbi

David Annen

David Annen

Priest

Joseph Long

Joseph Long

Imam

Andy Apollo

Andy Apollo

Armed Policeman

Hadley Fraser

Hadley Fraser

British Military Escort

Ziad Abaza

Ziad Abaza

Arab Shipmate

Nari Blair-Mangat

Nari Blair-Mangat

Waiter

Luke Brady

Luke Brady

Waiter

Miltos Yerolemou

Miltos Yerolemou

Old Turk Baker

Kathryn Wilder

Kathryn Wilder

Prostitute

Gerard Horan

Gerard Horan

Aynesworth

Richard Clifford

Richard Clifford

Maître d'

Sid Sagar

Sid Sagar

Sleeping Car Attendant

Adam Garcia

Adam Garcia

Italian Fan

Harry Lister Smith

Harry Lister Smith

Stockman

Darryl Clark

Darryl Clark

Salon Barman

Anoushka Lucas

Anoushka Lucas

Pianist

Matthew Hawksley

Matthew Hawksley

Waiter

Crispin Letts

Crispin Letts

Head Waiter

Yasmin Harrison

Yasmin Harrison

Dining Car Sous Chef

Kate Tydman

Kate Tydman

Chef

Pip Jordan

Pip Jordan

Kitchen Car Sous Chef

Chris Porter

Chris Porter

Station Master

Jack Riddiford

Jack Riddiford

Police Captain

Joshua Lacey

Joshua Lacey

Track Foreman

Phil Dunster

Phil Dunster

Colonel John Armstrong

Miranda Raison

Miranda Raison

Sonia Armstrong

Ansu Kabia

Ansu Kabia

Police Captain (Newsreel)

Hayat Kamille

Hayat Kamille

Susanne

Rami Nasr

Rami Nasr

McQueen's Father

Todd Boyce

Todd Boyce

Judge

Irfan Shamji

Irfan Shamji

Yugoslavian Police Officer

Tom Hanson

Tom Hanson

British Military Officer

Crew 43
Haris Zambarloukos

Haris Zambarloukos

Director of Photography

Alexandra Byrne

Alexandra Byrne

Costume Design

Wakana Yoshihara

Wakana Yoshihara

Hair Department Head

Naomi Donne

Naomi Donne

Makeup Artist

Wakana Yoshihara

Wakana Yoshihara

Makeup Department Head

James Embree

James Embree

Fight Choreographer

Lucy Scarfe

Lucy Scarfe

Stand In

James O'Donnell

James O'Donnell

Stunt Coordinator

Guiomar Alonso

Guiomar Alonso

Stunt Double

Shane Steyn

Shane Steyn

Stunt Double

Alan Calton

Alan Calton

Stunts

Derek Lea

Derek Lea

Stunts

Edward Upcott

Edward Upcott

Stunts

Gary Hoptrough

Gary Hoptrough

Stunts

Guiomar Alonso

Guiomar Alonso

Stunts

Ian Kay

Ian Kay

Stunts

James Embree

James Embree

Stunts

Levan Doran

Levan Doran

Stunts

Lewis Young

Lewis Young

Stunts

Lloyd Bass

Lloyd Bass

Stunts

Mens-Sana Tamakloe

Mens-Sana Tamakloe

Stunts

Nathan Aldous

Nathan Aldous

Stunts

Neil Finnighan

Neil Finnighan

Stunts

Peter Pedrero

Peter Pedrero

Stunts

Ramon Álvarez

Ramon Álvarez

Stunts

Ray Nicholas

Ray Nicholas

Stunts

Rick English

Rick English

Stunts

Shane Steyn

Shane Steyn

Stunts

Kenneth Branagh

Kenneth Branagh

Director

William Moseley

William Moseley

Associate Producer

Lucy Bevan

Lucy Bevan

Casting

James Prichard

James Prichard

Executive Producer

Aditya Sood

Aditya Sood

Producer

Kenneth Branagh

Kenneth Branagh

Producer

Mark Gordon

Mark Gordon

Producer

Michael Schaefer

Michael Schaefer

Producer

Ridley Scott

Ridley Scott

Producer

Simon Kinberg

Simon Kinberg

Producer

Patrick Doyle

Patrick Doyle

Original Music Composer

Mike Prestwood Smith

Mike Prestwood Smith

Sound Re-Recording Mixer

Josiane Fradette

Josiane Fradette

Visual Effects Producer

Agatha Christie

Agatha Christie

Novel

Michael Green

Michael Green

Screenplay

Gallery 296
Videos 2
Similar Movies 198
Recommended 43
US Release Dates 2

Nov 10, 2017

PG-13 Theatrical

Feb 20, 2018

PG-13 Physical

© 2025-2026 MovieNight. All rights reserved.

Hedonist Hypnotist

Hedonist Hypnotist

1970

VS
Iemand Soos jy

Iemand Soos jy

1978

Sign in to vote

Battle your watched movies head-to-head

Community Top Movies

🥇 Evil Dead II

Evil Dead II

1987 · 14 wins

🥈 The Dark Knight

The Dark Knight

2008 · 14 wins

🥉 Final Destination

Final Destination

2000 · 12 wins

#4 Top Gun: Maverick

Top Gun: Maverick

2022 · 11 wins

#5 Joker

Joker

2019 · 11 wins

Sign in to build your own ranking
0 Points
0/0 Correct
0 Streak

Playing as a guest — sign in to save your score and rank on the leaderboard.

Movie Trivia

Guess the movie from a clue — tagline, plot, cast and more. Pick from four posters.

What movie experience do you prefer?

Movie theater — theater popcorn with Icee/soda & maybe nachos 100%
At home — relaxed on your favorite couch or chair with whatever drinks & snacks are in the kitchen 0%
2 votes

What is your favorite movie genre?

Action 0%
Adventure 0%
Animation 0%
Comedy 0%
Crime 0%
Documentary 0%
Drama 0%
Family 0%
Fantasy 0%
History 0%
Horror 100%
Music 0%
Mystery 0%
Romance 0%
Science Fiction 0%
Thriller 0%
War 0%
Western 0%
2 votes
MovieNight
Home Browse Trending Top 100s Keywords Streaming Weekly Picks Blog Watchlist Trivia Guess the Movie Face-Off Watch Tonight Double Feature Birthday Movies MovieNight 100 Community This Day in Movies Ever thought, what to watch? Tops In Theaters Coming Soon New Releases
Hedonist Hypnotist

Hedonist Hypnotist

1970

VS
Iemand Soos jy

Iemand Soos jy

1978

Sign in to vote

Battle your watched movies head-to-head

Community Top Movies

🥇 Evil Dead II

Evil Dead II

1987 · 14 wins

🥈 The Dark Knight

The Dark Knight

2008 · 14 wins

🥉 Final Destination

Final Destination

2000 · 12 wins

#4 Top Gun: Maverick

Top Gun: Maverick

2022 · 11 wins

#5 Joker

Joker

2019 · 11 wins

Sign in to build your own ranking
0 Points
0/0 Correct
0 Streak

Playing as a guest — sign in to save your score and rank on the leaderboard.

Movie Trivia

Guess the movie from a clue — tagline, plot, cast and more. Pick from four posters.

What movie experience do you prefer?

Movie theater — theater popcorn with Icee/soda & maybe nachos 100%
At home — relaxed on your favorite couch or chair with whatever drinks & snacks are in the kitchen 0%
2 votes

What is your favorite movie genre?

Action 0%
Adventure 0%
Animation 0%
Comedy 0%
Crime 0%
Documentary 0%
Drama 0%
Family 0%
Fantasy 0%
History 0%
Horror 100%
Music 0%
Mystery 0%
Romance 0%
Science Fiction 0%
Thriller 0%
War 0%
Western 0%
2 votes

We use essential cookies to run MovieNight, plus analytics (Google Analytics) and advertising (Google AdSense) cookies. By continuing to browse, you agree to this — or click No and we won't. See our Terms & Privacy Policy to learn more.