MovieNight.app

Get the MovieNight app

Add it to your home screen — faster & full screen

A Different Man
A24 A24
?
Grand Motel Films
Killer Films Killer Films

Not part of a collection.

A Different Man

2024 112 min ★ 6.9 (505) Released
Comedy Drama

Aspiring actor Edward undergoes a radical medical procedure to drastically transform his appearance. But his new dream face quickly turns into a nightmare.

Original title
A Different Man
Language
EN
Country
US
Budget
Revenue
$1,169,365
Reviews & Ratings 4
B

badelf

May 6, 2026 · via TMDB

★ 7.0

**A Different Man (2024)** _Directed by Aaron Schimberg_ Aaron Schimberg's A Different Man announces its literary pedigree early, nodding to The Elephant Man and Cyrano de Bergerac (a clip plays on a TV screen, lest we miss the connection). But the true lineage, unacknowledged, is Hiroshi Teshigahara's The Face of Another (1966). Like that Japanese masterwork, Schimberg's film asks what happens when a man sheds his disfigured face, only to discover the prison was never external. The premise is solid, the comedy enjoyable, the performances committed; what's missing is the depth and creativity to fully realize its own twist. Edward (Sebastian Stan) lives with neurofibromatosis, his face a landscape of tumors that mark him as different in a world allergic to difference. He's a struggling actor, understandably withdrawn, yearning for the neighbor who's just moved in. When an experimental treatment offers him a conventional face, he seizes it, shedding his old identity like dead skin. Reborn as "Guy," handsome and anonymous, he believes he's finally free. But his neighbor Ingrid (Renate Reinsve), an aspiring playwright, has written a drama about Edward's former life, and the lead role goes to Oswald (Adam Pearson), a man with the same condition Edward escaped, but with none of Edward's self-loathing. Oswald is charismatic, confident, magnetic; everything Edward never was and Guy can never be. Here's where Schimberg's derivation from the Japanese classic takes hold: Edward's torment isn't simply that he's lost himself, but that he's convinced his transformation was a mistake. Had he stayed in his original face, he believes, he'd be in Oswald's place, living Oswald's life, winning Ingrid's heart. The film understands this is delusion; Edward and Oswald have diametrically opposite personalities, and Ingrid warned him from the start that she leaves a trail of broken hearts. But self-hatred doesn't traffic in logic. Edward's jealousy, his conviction that he chose wrong, becomes the engine driving him toward increasingly desperate acts. Stan and Pearson both commit fully to their roles. Stan makes Edward's misery palpable without begging for sympathy, while Pearson brings such genuine warmth and ease to Oswald that the character never feels like a symbolic rebuke. The comedy sprinkled throughout works precisely because it doesn't soften the film's darker currents; Schimberg has a good instinct for the absurd. What derails the experience are credibility gaps that yank the viewer out of the film's flow. For example, the notion that a highly experimental procedure would be tested in a proper double-blind study with a population this rare strains credibility. More troubling is the absence of any psychological scaffolding: In an era when gender transition requires extensive therapy and evaluation, the idea that someone could undergo such drastic facial reconstruction without commensurate mental health support feels like a convenient elision. These aren't minor quibbles; they're structural choices that undermine the film's psychological realism. Ultimately, A Different Man offers a premise that isn't particularly original, save for its jealousy-fueled twist. That twist needed greater character development, more creative exploration of what it means to believe you've made the unforgivable choice. Schimberg has the intelligence and the performers to deliver something richer, but the film settles for surface cleverness when depth was required. It's an interesting failure though, worth seeing for its ambitions and its moments of dark humor.

B

Brent Marchant

Jan 7, 2025 · via TMDB

★ 5.0

Stories that allegorically address themes related to self-esteem, social acceptance and prejudice undoubtedly merit our attention, provided that they execute their narratives in discernable, cogent, relatable ways. Unfortunately, though, that’s where writer-director Aaron Schimberg’s third feature drops the ball. The film follows the strange saga of Edward Lemuel (Sebastian Stan), an aspiring New York actor afflicted with a severe skin disfigurement that has left his face overcome with tumorous growths. However, when he learns of a radical new medical treatment that offers the hope of a cure, he jumps at the chance. And, before long, after a series of incidents that bring graphic new meaning to the term “skin peel,” he’s left with a normal (and quite handsome) appearance. But, now that he has this new look, is it what he really wants for himself? Can he adjust to it and what it affords? This change thus prompts him to ask himself these questions when he starts getting all of the things he had once supposedly longed for, such as a beautiful romantic interest, Ingrid (Renate Reinsve), and a lead role in an off-Broadway play. He can’t help but quietly wonder, “Am I suddenly being accepted because of my appearance or because of who I am as an individual?” What’s more, was the reaction that he previously received from others as bad as he thought it was, or was his perception clouded by his own distorted views of himself? That becomes especially true when he meets Oswald (Adam Pearson), a cheery, well-adjusted individual who leads a successful, fulfilling life despite being affected by the same health condition Edward once had. Conceptually speaking, these issues are universal themes that many of us might ask ourselves from time to time, all of which ultimately stem back to our view of whether we see the glass of life being half full or half empty. However, when examined through this prism, these ideas are unnecessarily muddled here by a clumsy script that can’t make up its mind what kind of movie it wants to be. Is it smart horror? A dark comedy? A psychological thriller? As it’s presented, the film is a jumbled combination of the foregoing punctuated by awkward and abrupt transitions, undercooked character development, and underwhelming explorations of its core notions. Indeed, rather than confidently tackling its primary intents head on, the picture spends much of its time dancing around them (and often tripping over its own feet in the process), particularly with the incorporation of odd, out-of-place plot elements that serve more to confuse the flow of the story than to clarify it. In many ways, the finished product becomes much like the quirky, bombastic works of filmmakers Charlie Kaufman, Ari Aster or Darren Aronofsky, one that leans more toward the needless excesses of “The Substance” (2024) than the graceful eloquence of “The Elephant Man” (1980). To its credit, “A Different Man” frequently comes across better than it probably should thanks to the solid performances of Pearson, Reinsve and Golden Globe Award winner Stan. But, given the film’s many other shortcomings, that’s hardly enough to save this production from itself.

good.film

good.film

Oct 30, 2024 · via TMDB

_A Different Man_ delights with a delicious paradox: take a character who feels outcast because of his looks, and then – _voila_. Melt away his differences. _Would he suddenly fit in? Would his life instantly turn around? Or is “success” far more than skin deep?_ New York writer-director Aaron Schimberg wants us to ponder if Edward is better off than he was before. We're caught between wondering if he's a victim of society’s need for normalcy – or a victim of _his own_ victim complex. With his third feature, Schimberg creates a tantalising fantasy with oodles to say about perception, identity and inner happiness. His dark comic story peers deep into how we deal with “otherness” in society – and how we often revert, in our private moments, to letting our exteriors define who we are inside. The cherry on top? The scene when Edward’s tumours start loosening, and he literally begins peeling his face off in stringy strips. Whether real or imagined, it’s up there with cinema’s most memorably horrifying special FX. Read our full review of _A Different Man_ at good.film: https://good.film/guide/a-different-man-literally-strips-away-how-we-look-at-disfigurement

CinemaSerf

CinemaSerf

Oct 6, 2024 · via TMDB

★ 7.0

"Edward" (Sebastian Stan) is a facially disfigured man, stuck in a rundown apartment, whose life isn't really going anywhere fast. Then he gets a new neighbour. "Ingrid" (Renato Reinsve) is a writer who befriends him and promises him a part in her play. Meantime, his doctors manage to get him on a radical course of treatment that gradually returns his face to a more normal visage. Returning to his flat, and with some fairly grotesque things emerging from his leaky ceiling, he realises that nobody recognises him anymore so he has to assume a different identity. That's when he discovers that "Ingrid" is, indeed, putting on a play - and that the old "Edward" is the title and the topic. He wants the part. It's his part. How to get it though without giving the game away? Add to his frustrations the arrival of "Oswald" (Adam Pearson) who is an ostensibly decent character but who also wants the role, and he has the aesthetics as opposed to the prosthetics. "Ingrid" has tough choices to make but where might this leave "Edward"? There's something quite circular about the way this story pans out. A sort of be careful what you wish for type scenario that gives and removes hope from "Edward" and almost creates a villain of the piece too! Is that merited or is that justified? The drama shines a light on the more shallow attitudes amidst society, on our intolerances and assumptions but it also swipes at the fickleness of friendships, fame and success - all rather engagingly delivered by both Stan and Pearson. It's the former man who positively exudes exasperation as the denouement (only vaguely) skirts the Chaplinesque. It's on that note that it's worth saying this is quite funny at times, too - the writing doesn't try to impose any morals on us, rather it presents us with some scenarios and lets us enjoy and evaluate as we go. It doesn't hang about, and right from the start we hit the ground running as the characters develop, the personalities emerge - for good or bad, and it's well worth a couple of hours in a cinema. I got more from it second time round as I was able to focus a little more on the nuance than the imagery.

User reviews courtesy of TMDB.

Keywords 14
aspiring actor baffled body horror cautionary dark comedy empathetic identity ironic new york city pathetic pity playwright self hatred transformation
Buy
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Apple TV Store Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
YouTube YouTube
Fandango At Home Fandango At Home
Streaming
HBO Max Amazon Channel HBO Max Amazon Channel
YouTube TV YouTube TV
Cinemax Amazon Channel Cinemax Amazon Channel
HBO Max HBO Max
Cinemax Apple TV Channel Cinemax Apple TV Channel
Rent
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Apple TV Store Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
YouTube YouTube
Fandango At Home Fandango At Home
Spectrum On Demand Spectrum On Demand
Cast 26
Sebastian Stan

Sebastian Stan

Edward

Renate Reinsve

Renate Reinsve

Ingrid

Adam Pearson

Adam Pearson

Oswald

Miles G. Jackson

Miles G. Jackson

Sean

Patrick Wang

Patrick Wang

Director

Neal Davidson

Neal Davidson

Corey

Marc Geller

Marc Geller

Ragged Man

Sergio Delavicci

Sergio Delavicci

Mover

Lawrence Arancio

Lawrence Arancio

Landlord

Billy Griffith

Billy Griffith

Ollie

John Keating

John Keating

Dr. Varno

C. Mason Wells

C. Mason Wells

Carl

Corey Taylor

Corey Taylor

Luther

Malachi Weir

Malachi Weir

Dr. Flexner

Nina White

Nina White

Dr. Trutz

Juney Smith

Juney Smith

Nestor

Lucy Kaminsky

Lucy Kaminsky

Mariana

Owen Kline

Owen Kline

Nick

Jarvis Tomdio

Jarvis Tomdio

Clay

Karoline

Karoline

Vivian

Martin Ewens

Martin Ewens

Makeup Artist

Caroline Golum

Caroline Golum

Karaoke Singer

Eleanore Pienta

Eleanore Pienta

Sadie

Charlie Korsmo

Charlie Korsmo

Ron Belcher

Michael Shannon

Michael Shannon

Michael Shannon

Aaron Schimberg

Aaron Schimberg

Man in Bar (uncredited)

Crew 11
Mike Marino

Mike Marino

Makeup Designer

Blaise Corrigan

Blaise Corrigan

Stunts

Daniel Goldhaber

Daniel Goldhaber

Thanks

Josephine Decker

Josephine Decker

Thanks

Aaron Schimberg

Aaron Schimberg

Director

Nat Jencks

Nat Jencks

Colorist

Pamela Koffler

Pamela Koffler

Co-Producer

Aaron Schimberg

Aaron Schimberg

Executive Producer

Sebastian Stan

Sebastian Stan

Executive Producer

Christine Vachon

Christine Vachon

Producer

Aaron Schimberg

Aaron Schimberg

Writer

Gallery 145
Videos 9
Similar Movies 240
US Release Dates 6

Jan 21, 2024

Sundance Film Festival

Premiere

Apr 3, 2024

New Directors/New Films

Premiere

Sep 20, 2024

R Theatrical (Limited)

Oct 4, 2024

Limited Expansion

R Theatrical (Limited)

Nov 5, 2024

R Digital

Jan 17, 2025

Max

R Digital

© 2025-2026 MovieNight. All rights reserved.

Wasting, sinking, dazzling, floating

Wasting, sinking, dazzling, floating

2024

VS
That Model from Paris

That Model from Paris

1926

Sign in to vote

Battle your watched movies head-to-head

Community Top Movies

🥇 Evil Dead II

Evil Dead II

1987 · 14 wins

🥈 The Dark Knight

The Dark Knight

2008 · 14 wins

🥉 Halloween

Halloween

1978 · 13 wins

#4 Final Destination

Final Destination

2000 · 12 wins

#5 Halloween II

Halloween II

1981 · 11 wins

Sign in to build your own ranking
0 Points
0/0 Correct
0 Streak

Playing as a guest — sign in to save your score and rank on the leaderboard.

Movie Trivia

Guess the movie from a clue — tagline, plot, cast and more. Pick from four posters.

What movie experience do you prefer?

Movie theater — theater popcorn with Icee/soda & maybe nachos 67%
At home — relaxed on your favorite couch or chair with whatever drinks & snacks are in the kitchen 33%
3 votes

What is your favorite movie genre?

Action 33%
Adventure 0%
Animation 0%
Comedy 0%
Crime 0%
Documentary 0%
Drama 0%
Family 0%
Fantasy 0%
History 0%
Horror 67%
Music 0%
Mystery 0%
Romance 0%
Science Fiction 0%
Thriller 0%
War 0%
Western 0%
3 votes
Install MovieNight

Add MovieNight to your home screen for a fast, full-screen experience:

  1. Tap the Share button in Safari
  2. Scroll down and tap Add to Home Screen
  3. Tap Add
MovieNight
Home Browse Trending Top 100s Keywords Streaming Weekly Picks Blog Watchlist Trivia Guess the Movie Face-Off Watch Tonight Double Feature Birthday Movies MovieNight 100 Community This Day in Movies Ever thought, what to watch? Tops In Theaters Coming Soon New Releases
Wasting, sinking, dazzling, floating

Wasting, sinking, dazzling, floating

2024

VS
That Model from Paris

That Model from Paris

1926

Sign in to vote

Battle your watched movies head-to-head

Community Top Movies

🥇 Evil Dead II

Evil Dead II

1987 · 14 wins

🥈 The Dark Knight

The Dark Knight

2008 · 14 wins

🥉 Halloween

Halloween

1978 · 13 wins

#4 Final Destination

Final Destination

2000 · 12 wins

#5 Halloween II

Halloween II

1981 · 11 wins

Sign in to build your own ranking
0 Points
0/0 Correct
0 Streak

Playing as a guest — sign in to save your score and rank on the leaderboard.

Movie Trivia

Guess the movie from a clue — tagline, plot, cast and more. Pick from four posters.

What movie experience do you prefer?

Movie theater — theater popcorn with Icee/soda & maybe nachos 67%
At home — relaxed on your favorite couch or chair with whatever drinks & snacks are in the kitchen 33%
3 votes

What is your favorite movie genre?

Action 33%
Adventure 0%
Animation 0%
Comedy 0%
Crime 0%
Documentary 0%
Drama 0%
Family 0%
Fantasy 0%
History 0%
Horror 67%
Music 0%
Mystery 0%
Romance 0%
Science Fiction 0%
Thriller 0%
War 0%
Western 0%
3 votes

We use essential cookies to run MovieNight, plus analytics (Google Analytics) and advertising (Google AdSense) cookies. By continuing to browse, you agree to this — or click No and we won't. See our Terms & Privacy Policy to learn more.