MovieNight.app

Get the MovieNight app

Add it to your home screen — faster & full screen

Greyhound
Bron Studios Bron Studios
FilmNation Entertainment FilmNation Entertainment
Playtone Playtone
Sony Pictures Sony Pictures
Stage 6 Films Stage 6 Films

Not part of a collection.

Greyhound

The only thing more dangerous than the front lines was the fight to get there.

2020 92 min ★ 7.4 (3,453) Released
Action Drama War

A first-time captain leads a convoy of allied ships carrying thousands of soldiers across the treacherous waters of the "Black Pit" to the front lines of WWII. With no air cover protection for 5 days, the captain and his convoy must battle the surrounding enemy Nazi U-boats in order to give the allies a chance to win the war.

Original title
Greyhound
Language
EN
Country
CA,US
Budget
$50,300,000
Revenue
Reviews & Ratings 6
TkA

TkA

Jul 31, 2026 · via TMDB

★ 2.0

**Forgettable movie** It starts out with a few scenes with the captain and his girlfriend, who showed no emotion, something that wouldn't have fit the time period. She doesn't care, he doesn't care, and no one else seems to care because nothing about that is ever followed up on, so as a result, i don't care.\ \ It was set in the Atlantic on one ship, but it was difficult to believe it was a ship, and more believable to consider it was in a sound stage. Actors didn't seem to care, filmmakers didn't seem to care, so i don't care.\ \ Ships of the era were renamed to imaginary names, and the CGI was too fast and obvious, it makes me wonder why they spent so much effort scanning real ships in 3D, they didn't care about making it real, so i don't care either.\ \ The movie had no point, no real story, just events that happen during a single imagined story of one crossing of the Atlantic (of probably 100's-1000's during the period), no one involved seem to care about telling a tale, so i don't care either.\ \ I rolled my eyes at so many of the moments they put in here that just weren't believable, and then realized this was another Hollywood shell of a movie.\ \ I came to read some comments and some recommended Das Boot, so I watched that, and it helped wipe the failure of this movie a bit. There are far better movies out there than this one.

T

tmdb28039023

Aug 27, 2022 · via TMDB

★ 3.0

I never thought I'd see Tom Hanks starring in a feature film with the same production values as a SyFy Channel original movie, but here is Greyhound – an otherwise tight, lean, and straightforward picture. Director Aaron Schneider and Hanks, who also wrote the script, do a good job developing suspense and urgency; for example the opening sequence wherein the crew of the Fletcher-class destroyer Greyhound patiently stalks and intercepts a German submarine before eventually blowing it up with depth charges, or when, after the hunter becomes the hunted and the American destroyer comes under heavy fire, the captain of the Greywolf – another, much more fearsome, German submarine – radios the Greyhound to taunt the crew with omens of doom; other than this disembodied voice we hear or see no Nazis, and the Greywolf, like Moby Dick, appears only until the very end, all of which adds to the sense of constant, ever-present danger. Greyhound is best when decisions are made and orders are given on the ship’s bridge. Unfortunately the thrill of the hunt loses its impact when we peek outside and see that the Greyhound is surrounded by a completely computer-generated sea – as if it's sailing through an ocean of half-congealed grape jelly. Say what you will about Waterworld, but at least it was honest; I don't care if they used a real body of water or just dug a giant pit and filled it one bucket at a time – the point is, it was honest-to-goodness H2O. On the other hand, Greyhound's Atlantic Ocean and everything in it – ships, submarines, explosions – achieves a level of fakery that not even Hanks's considerable gravitas can overcome. As far as I'm concerned, he's just playing a real-time strategy video game, to the point that when someone died I didn't care; I would just tell myself, “it’s okay, it was just another non-playable character.”

Peter McGinn

Peter McGinn

May 10, 2021 · via TMDB

Let this review reflects that I really enjoyed this movie. It seems a lot of war movie fans didn’t, so since I only enjoy the occasional war film, perhaps it makes sense I would like Greyhound. It is a surprisingly short movie at just over 90 minutes. Since I am a writer (though not a successful one), I can imagine the scriptwriter (wait, Tom Hanks!?) wanting to compress the action to help give the film a sense of immediacy, a pacing to match the key moments of battle. But who knows, besides Hanks and a few others? Not all war movies need to be of epic proportion; let’s allow some of them to simply tell a compelling story, if only for non war movie fans such as Myself. Most of the acting is restrained, and that makes sense. This was the captain’s first real gig on patrol, so he needed to present a calm, commanding presence no matter how his insides twirled and spun. As for the crew, their lives depended upon staying cool under pressure. I really liked Stephen Graham’s quiet confidence in his crucial role interpreting the sonar. I thought there was enough tension to drive the story forward, especially when you consider that the most tense moments are when you don’t see anything - while the U-Boat subs are under water. There has been chatter that this war film is not realistic or accurate in key details, but I wonder about that. I see where the novel by C. S. Forester that the movie is based on was used as a navy training text for many years. So there’s that. I plan to watch Greyhound again, as it strikes me as one of those movies that might reveal subtle details with a second viewing. That’s my story and I am sticking to it, as it gives mer a reason to re-watch it. *** Note: I just watched it a second time, and I stand by my positive review. I caught a few details I missed the first time by having the captions turned on. ***

L

Louisa Moore - Screen Zealots

Aug 31, 2020 · via TMDB

★ 3.0

When you hear the words “a Tom Hanks war movie,” there are certain expectations of quality that flash in your head (with good reason). Perhaps that’s why “Greyhound” feels like such a disappointment. This World War II military action film is one of the most boring war movies I have ever seen. The screenplay, written by Hanks and based on the novel “The Good Shepherd” by C.S. Forester, recounts the fictional story of Captain Krause (Hanks), a veteran Navy officer who is serving as a first-time captain of a U.S. destroyer. Krause is tasked with protecting a convoy of three dozen ships carrying thousands of soldiers and supplies across the Atlantic. Krause and his men must navigate the treacherous waters for five days with no air support, relying only on the aid of two additional escort ships in an area of the ocean dubbed the “Black Pit.” Things get really bad when the fleet is attacked by Nazi U-boats, and a lengthy battle of ships vs. submarines breaks out. The story is inspired by events that took place during the Battle of the Atlantic in the early days of WWII, but it’s not a true story. If that wasn’t enough of a bummer, the film is mediocre all around. From the dreadful original score (by Blake Neely) to the weak special effects and dreary cinematography, the movie screams “low budget” in more ways than one. It’s not cinematic, and the production values look and feel cheap. The film is poorly directed (by Aaron Schneider), who seems to hold a pathetic understanding of the architecture of visual excitement and suspense. Hence, the wartime action is mediocre and dull, and the entire project is little more than a crudely edited jump cut fiesta. Hanks has written his character in such a one-dimensional manner that all Captain Krause really does is quote Bible verses and bark military lingo. The film assumes an advanced knowledge of technical military terms, making it all to easy to check out of the experience. It’s also overly religious, to the point that it could easily be a faith-based film. “Greyhound” is nothing more than one long, non-exciting battle between a warship and submarines. There are far too many good war movies to spend your time watching than this blunder.

M

MovieGuys

Jul 11, 2020 · via TMDB

Greyhound is watchable but entirely fanciful. Tom Hanks is a Captain of a destroyer taking on the u-boat menace. He's fearless, god fearing, modest and faces down hordes of u-boats who are out to get him. The enemy goads him, sends u-boats to face off with destroyers in 18th century style exchanges and sails around on the surface following his floatilla, in open defiance. Now for an injection of reality. U-boats did not take on destroyers in surface battles of the kind you see in this film. They did not goad their captains (and records show they took no pleasure in the job they did) nor did they let the destroyer know they were there. This is a fiction and a rather silly one at that. U-boats were not a match for a destroyer, in any sense and made every effort to evade them. The US in the early days of this war, were hopelessly outclassed by u-boat packs. It took considerable time before they started defending merchant shipping. Their admirality mostly declined advice and help from their more experienced, British counterparts. This predictably made the situation a lot worse. Eventually they did catch up but only after suffering massive losses. This film is, in short, a fiction. Its entertaining, its well acted, I do like Tom Hanks and the action scenes whilst in many instances ridiculous, are well rendered and frenetic. So by all means watch Greyhound for pure entertainment but don't expect a "Das Boot" experience by any means. Its worth mentioning too that even Das Boot was not 100% correct but a lot closer to the truth than this film could ever hope to be. 6/10.

M

Manuel São Bento

Jul 6, 2020 · via TMDB

★ 5.0

If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog @ https://www.msbreviews.com I love war movies, especially when they're able to depict the action in such an immersive way that the viewers really feel like they're there. In my opinion, it's the genre that most requires a technically outstanding production quality. The visual effects need to be absolutely perfect. The cinematography must capture the intensity of the battlefield. The sound design has to be incredibly powerful. Finally, a war film requires the most epic, nail-biting, chill-inducing score so the audience can actually feel the unbelievable atmosphere that this genre usually possesses. Greyhound has one of the greatest actors of all-time as its protagonist, but does it check the points mentioned above? Yes and no. Technically, this movie barely has any issues. The VFX look utterly stunning, no doubt about it. Shelly Jackson, the cinematographer, has one of the most challenging tasks a filmmaker can have: filming in a water environment. He deals with this problem surprisingly well, by allowing the viewers to fully understand everything that's going on for the entire runtime. The score (Blake Neely) is emotionally powerful, but I believe it could have elevated a lot more action sequences than it actually does. The editing (Mark Czyzewski, Sidney Wolinsky) is excellent as well. So, what failed? Well, I will always defend that the two pillars of any film are its story and characters. Without one of these two, very few movies can survive. Without the two, no film can. I have to use Dunkirk as an example here. Christopher Nolan spent the whole marketing campaign saying that his movie was about the depiction of an actual war. About how it felt to actually be in one. Therefore, Dunkirk barely has any sort of character development… because not only it never intended to, but it doesn't need it to accomplish its goal. However, its storytelling follows a distinct method that allows for some exhilarating moments in the air, ground, and sea. Its action sequences are so powerful and incredibly realistic that I consider it the most immersive war experience I have ever experienced. Thus, the lack of compelling characters didn't really bother me because I was there to try to feel what it's like to be in a war. Greyhound also doesn't have one single character who's well-developed or well-explored. They all seem to have names, and that's it. Tom Hanks is obviously impressive in his acting role… But his skills as a screenwriter definitely need to improve. Like I insinuate above, there's no problem in having depthless characters, as long as the story and, in this case, the action, work. None do. I'm not lying when I write that 90%+ of the script is Hanks yelling "turn right", "hard left", "slow down", and hundreds of other types of direction guidelines in nautical language. The action is lackluster. Basically, the whole film is a repetitive, tiresome cycle of a U-boat showing up on the radar, Hanks looking through several windows shouting the same nautical stuff to his crew, and trying to eliminate the enemy's ships. I could feel the suspense and the tension that Hanks' ship emanated. I love the first encounter and pursuit of the first U-boat, it's exceptionally filmed and quite riveting. But from this moment on, it's just the same sequence stuck on repeat mode until no more ships exist. So, even though the set pieces look marvelous, these scenes quickly lose impact. Aaron Schneider should have found a way of elevating Hanks' screenplay, but unfortunately, he can only do so much. By the end, I'm left with a character whose name I can barely remember (honestly, I needed two full minutes to remember the protagonist's name after the movie ended). All in all, Greyhound could have easily ended up as a small-scale Dunkirk. Technically, it has everything it needs to be a brilliant war flick: beautiful visual effects, powerful sound design, impeccable cinematography, and an epic score. Disregarding one of the two pillars of filmmaking (story and characters) is only an issue if the other also doesn't work. The lack of any character development can be perfectly compensated in a war film, as long as the method of storytelling allows for a unique experience packed with realistic and immersive action. However, Aaron Schneider's movie doesn't possess a compelling story, and the action set pieces are stuck in a dull cycle of hunting U-boats in the exact same way throughout the whole film. The first sequence is packed with tension and suspense, but from that moment on, the entertainment levels drop drastically. Tom Hanks is fantastic as the protagonist, but his screenplay is far from truly being one. All dialogues revolve around characters (mostly Hanks's) calling nautical instructions for most of the runtime and looking either through a window or binoculars. In the end, it's underwhelming and disappointing, but I still recommend it to the war genre's aficionados. Rating: C

User reviews courtesy of TMDB.

Keywords 11
allies atlantic ocean based on true story battleship biting convoy naval battleship naval warfare submarine tense world war ii
Buy
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Apple TV Store Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
YouTube YouTube
Fandango At Home Fandango At Home
Streaming
Apple TV Apple TV
Apple TV Amazon Channel Apple TV Amazon Channel
Rent
Amazon Video Amazon Video
Apple TV Store Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies Google Play Movies
YouTube YouTube
Fandango At Home Fandango At Home
Cast 43
Tom Hanks

Tom Hanks

Commander Krause

Stephen Graham

Stephen Graham

Charlie Cole

Rob Morgan

Rob Morgan

Cleveland

Josh Wiggins

Josh Wiggins

Talker #1

Tom Brittney

Tom Brittney

Lt. Watson

Elisabeth Shue

Elisabeth Shue

Evelyn

Will Pullen

Will Pullen

Talker #3

Manuel Garcia-Rulfo

Manuel Garcia-Rulfo

Lopez

Karl Glusman

Karl Glusman

Eppstein

Chet Hanks

Chet Hanks

Bushnell

Jimi Stanton

Jimi Stanton

Lt. Harbutt

Matt Helm

Matt Helm

Lt. Nystrom

Devin Druid

Devin Druid

Wallace

Craig Tate

Craig Tate

Pitts

Travis Quentin

Travis Quentin

Ipsen

Jeff Burkes

Jeff Burkes

Shannon

Matthew Zuk

Matthew Zuk

Flusser

Joseph Poliquin

Joseph Poliquin

Lee Helmsman #1

Casey Bond

Casey Bond

Helmsman #1

Michael Benz

Michael Benz

Carling

Grayson Russell

Grayson Russell

Signalman #1

Ian James Corlett

Ian James Corlett

Dicky

Maximilian Osinski

Maximilian Osinski

Eagle

Dominic Keating

Dominic Keating

Harry

Dave Davis

Dave Davis

Boatswain's Mate #1

Parker Wierling

Parker Wierling

Messenger #1

Ian Pala

Ian Pala

Radarman

Travis Przybylski

Travis Przybylski

Dawson

Cade Burk

Cade Burk

Starboard Lookout

Jesse Gallegos

Jesse Gallegos

Signalman #2

Alex Kramer

Alex Kramer

Talker #2

Lee Norris

Lee Norris

Messenger #2

Adam Aalderks

Adam Aalderks

Helmsman #2

Keon Motakhaveri

Keon Motakhaveri

Lee Helmsman #2

Jake Ventimiglia

Jake Ventimiglia

Fippler

Michael Carollo

Michael Carollo

Forward Lookout

Caleb J. Thaggard

Caleb J. Thaggard

Port Lookout

John Frederick

John Frederick

Chief Quartermaster Frederick

Jeff Adler

Jeff Adler

Rudel

Thomas Kretschmann

Thomas Kretschmann

Grey Wolf (voice)

Dave Maldonado

Dave Maldonado

Dr. Temme

Jon Donahue

Jon Donahue

Al

Cameron Stout

Cameron Stout

Navy Crewman (uncredited)

Crew 33
Shelly Johnson

Shelly Johnson

Director of Photography

Steven Quale

Steven Quale

Second Unit Director of Photography

Julie Weiss

Julie Weiss

Costume Design

Doug Coleman

Doug Coleman

Stunt Coordinator

Aaron Matthews

Aaron Matthews

Stunts

Chris J. Fanguy

Chris J. Fanguy

Stunts

Jeff Brockton

Jeff Brockton

Stunts

Kenny Bartram

Kenny Bartram

Stunts

Matt Cipro

Matt Cipro

Stunts

Preston Schrag

Preston Schrag

Stunts

Tyler Galpin

Tyler Galpin

Stunts

Aaron Schneider

Aaron Schneider

Director

Steven Quale

Steven Quale

Second Unit Director

Sidney Wolinsky

Sidney Wolinsky

Editor

Terri Douglas

Terri Douglas

ADR Voice Casting

Francine Maisler

Francine Maisler

Casting

Aaron L. Gilbert

Aaron L. Gilbert

Executive Producer

Aaron Ryder

Aaron Ryder

Executive Producer

Alison Cohen

Alison Cohen

Executive Producer

Anjay Nagpal

Anjay Nagpal

Executive Producer

Ben Nearn

Ben Nearn

Executive Producer

Han Sanping

Han Sanping

Executive Producer

Jason Cloth

Jason Cloth

Executive Producer

Michael Jackman

Michael Jackman

Executive Producer

Milan Popelka

Milan Popelka

Executive Producer

Tom Rice

Tom Rice

Executive Producer

Gary Goetzman

Gary Goetzman

Producer

Blake Neely

Blake Neely

Conductor

Blake Neely

Blake Neely

Orchestrator

Blake Neely

Blake Neely

Original Music Composer

Beau Borders

Beau Borders

Sound Re-Recording Mixer

C. S. Forester

C. S. Forester

Novel

Tom Hanks

Tom Hanks

Screenplay

Gallery 243
Videos 3
Similar Movies 308
US Release Dates 1

Jul 9, 2020

Apple TV+

PG-13 Digital

© 2025-2026 MovieNight. All rights reserved.

Stripper Wives

Stripper Wives

1999

VS
Sally's Beauty Spot

Sally's Beauty Spot

1990

Sign in to vote

Battle your watched movies head-to-head

Community Top Movies

🥇 Evil Dead II

Evil Dead II

1987 · 14 wins

🥈 The Dark Knight

The Dark Knight

2008 · 14 wins

🥉 Halloween

Halloween

1978 · 13 wins

#4 Final Destination

Final Destination

2000 · 12 wins

#5 Halloween II

Halloween II

1981 · 11 wins

Sign in to build your own ranking
0 Points
0/0 Correct
0 Streak

Playing as a guest — sign in to save your score and rank on the leaderboard.

Movie Trivia

Guess the movie from a clue — tagline, plot, cast and more. Pick from four posters.

What movie experience do you prefer?

Movie theater — theater popcorn with Icee/soda & maybe nachos 67%
At home — relaxed on your favorite couch or chair with whatever drinks & snacks are in the kitchen 33%
3 votes

What is your favorite movie genre?

Action 50%
Adventure 0%
Animation 0%
Comedy 0%
Crime 0%
Documentary 0%
Drama 0%
Family 0%
Fantasy 0%
History 0%
Horror 50%
Music 0%
Mystery 0%
Romance 0%
Science Fiction 0%
Thriller 0%
War 0%
Western 0%
4 votes
Install MovieNight

Add MovieNight to your home screen for a fast, full-screen experience:

  1. Tap the Share button in Safari
  2. Scroll down and tap Add to Home Screen
  3. Tap Add
MovieNight
Home Browse Trending Top 100s Keywords Streaming Weekly Picks Blog Watchlist Trivia Guess the Movie Face-Off Watch Tonight Double Feature Birthday Movies MovieNight 100 Community This Day in Movies Ever thought, what to watch? Tops In Theaters Coming Soon New Releases
Stripper Wives

Stripper Wives

1999

VS
Sally's Beauty Spot

Sally's Beauty Spot

1990

Sign in to vote

Battle your watched movies head-to-head

Community Top Movies

🥇 Evil Dead II

Evil Dead II

1987 · 14 wins

🥈 The Dark Knight

The Dark Knight

2008 · 14 wins

🥉 Halloween

Halloween

1978 · 13 wins

#4 Final Destination

Final Destination

2000 · 12 wins

#5 Halloween II

Halloween II

1981 · 11 wins

Sign in to build your own ranking
0 Points
0/0 Correct
0 Streak

Playing as a guest — sign in to save your score and rank on the leaderboard.

Movie Trivia

Guess the movie from a clue — tagline, plot, cast and more. Pick from four posters.

What movie experience do you prefer?

Movie theater — theater popcorn with Icee/soda & maybe nachos 67%
At home — relaxed on your favorite couch or chair with whatever drinks & snacks are in the kitchen 33%
3 votes

What is your favorite movie genre?

Action 50%
Adventure 0%
Animation 0%
Comedy 0%
Crime 0%
Documentary 0%
Drama 0%
Family 0%
Fantasy 0%
History 0%
Horror 50%
Music 0%
Mystery 0%
Romance 0%
Science Fiction 0%
Thriller 0%
War 0%
Western 0%
4 votes

We use essential cookies to run MovieNight, plus analytics (Google Analytics) and advertising (Google AdSense) cookies. By continuing to browse, you agree to this — or click No and we won't. See our Terms & Privacy Policy to learn more.